Tag Archives: Clarence Thomas
Government Predators Hunt Conservatives
The Feds have long had conservatives in the sights of their weapons of war. And they’ve had powerful allies in this battle in the legacy news media, government schools, and, more recently, social media and corporate America, including virtually all of the entertainment and publishing industries. There’s no need for an exhaustive list of the ways leftists hunt conservatives. Every conservative with eyes and an amygdala perceives the threat.
Posted in Federal, Religious Liberty
Tagged Alliance Defending Freedom, Bill Clinton, Clarence Thomas, Defense of Marriage Act, Mike Lee, Obergefell, Respect for Marriage Act, Roe, Susan Collins, Tammy Baldwin
Comments Off on Government Predators Hunt Conservatives
Democrats Have Marriage and States’ Rights in Their Sights for Lame Duck Session
Since the unconstitutional Roe v. Wade was overturned in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, leftists have been roiling in rage at the thought that states are now free to enact the will of their voters with regard to killing humans in the womb. In his concurrence, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas argued that three other Supreme Court cases should be revisited in that they too lacked constitutional grounding—an argument made also by the esteemed Antonin Scalia and Robert Bork.
One of the decisions Thomas believes should be revisited is the Obergefell decision that imposed same-sex “marriage” …
Posted in Federal, Marriage/Family/Culture
Tagged Adam Kinzinger, Antonin Scalia, Bill Clinton, Brian Mast, Clarence Thomas, Darrell Issa, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Elise Stefanik, Lee Zeldin, Liz Cheney, Michael Waltz, Obergefell, Respect for Marriage Act, Rob Portman, Robert Bork, Rodney Davis, Roe v. Wade, Same-sex marriage, Susan Collins, Thom Tillis, Tom Emmer, U.S. Supreme Court
Comments Off on Democrats Have Marriage and States’ Rights in Their Sights for Lame Duck Session
Unprincipled Republicans Vote FOR the Disrespect for Marriage Act
Since the unconstitutional Roe was overturned, leftists have been roiling in rage at the thought that states are now free to enact the will of the people with regard to killing humans in the womb. In his concurrence, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas argued that three other Supreme Court cases should be revisited in that they too lacked constitutional grounding—an argument made also by the esteemed Antonin Scalia and Robert Bork.
Posted in Federal, Marriage/Family/Culture
Tagged Adam Kinzinger, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Darrell Issa, Defense of Marriage Act, Elise Stefanik, H.R. 8404, Lee Zeldin, Liz Cheney, Obergefell, Respect for Marriage Act, Robert Bork, Rodney Davis, Roe v. Wade, Tom Emmer
Comments Off on Unprincipled Republicans Vote FOR the Disrespect for Marriage Act
Citing Racial Discrimination, Black Leaders Target Roe v. Wade
An Alabama lawsuit on behalf of unborn black babies that’s making its way through the state’s courts is alleging that the abortion industry is deliberately targeting black Americans and other minorities. If successful, the attorneys and activists behind the case claim that it might ultimately lead to the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 precedent-setting U.S. Supreme Court opinion that struck down state laws against abortion.
Posted in Sanctity of Life
Tagged 14th Amendment, Alabama Supreme Court, Alan Guttmacher, Alveda King, Amie Beth Shaver, Baby Q, Black Lives Matter, Box v. Planned Parenthood, Brent Helms, Catherine Davis, Clarence Thomas, Col. John Eidsmoe, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, equal protection under the law, Equality Proclamation, Human Life Protection Act, Kay Ivey, Ku Klux Klan, Maafa 21, Margaret Sanger, Miss Alabama, Ninth Amendment, Roe v. Wade, Sam McLure, Steve Marshall, The Epoch Times
Comments Off on Citing Racial Discrimination, Black Leaders Target Roe v. Wade
The Cutting Issues in Ministerial Exception Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court in Hosanna-Tabor (2012) and Our Lady of Guadalupe (2020) embraced what Justice Samuel Alito described as the “so-called ministerial exception,” a doctrine that exempts religious organizations from discrimination laws when dealing with certain employees. Why “so-called”? Because the exemption covers more than just ministers or the top officials of a religious organization. But whom else? Certainly some teachers in church elementary schools, as the U.S. Supreme Court held in both of those cases.
Posted in Religious Liberty
Tagged Clarence Thomas, Gordon College, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Neil Gorsuch, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, Samuel Alito, U.S. Supreme Court
Comments Off on The Cutting Issues in Ministerial Exception Cases
Chief Justice Roberts Votes with Liberals Against Tiny Humans and Women
In June Medical Services v. Russo, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts again disappoints conservatives. Roberts voted with the politically “progressive”/morally regressive majority to strike down a Louisiana law requiring abortionists to have hospital privileges within 30 miles of the slaughterhouse in which they kill tiny humans and occasionally end up killing or maiming their mothers. This law would have required abortuaries in which surgical procedures are performed to adhere to the same safety regulations as all other ambulatory surgical centers.
Posted in Federal, Sanctity of Life
Tagged Abner Mikva, Abortion, Alan Dershowitz, ambulatory surgical centers, Archibald Cox, Clarence Thomas, Earl Warren, Edward Lazarus, Gordon Gekko, human slaughter, Jeffrey Rosen, John Hart Ely, John Roberts, Kermit Roosevelt, Laurence Tribe, Louisiana, Michael Kinsley, Richard Cohen, Roe v. Wade, Science, SCOTUS, Sophie Lewis, Supreme Court, surgery, William Saletan
Comments Off on Chief Justice Roberts Votes with Liberals Against Tiny Humans and Women
Shocking SCOTUS Decision Shockingly Written by Gorsuch
In a shocking U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decision, Justice Neil Gorsuch voted with the axis of evil—that is, with Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor. In Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, the axis of evil decided that in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the word “sex” includes “sexual orientation” and “gender identity”—both subjectively constituted conditions. As a result, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination in employment based on “race, color, religion, sex, and national origin,” now prohibits …
Posted in Federal, Sexuality
Tagged Bostock v. Clayton County, Brett Kavanaugh, Civil Rights Act, Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan, Gay, Georgia, J.K. Rowling, Jack Phillips, John Roberts, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, Neil Gorsuch, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, transgender
Comments Off on Shocking SCOTUS Decision Shockingly Written by Gorsuch
