Nine Reasons to Reject Equal Rights Amendment
 
Nine Reasons to Reject Equal Rights Amendment
Written By Kathy Valente   |   05.26.14

On May 22, 2014, the Illinois Senate voted 39 to 11 to pass SJRCA 75, the dangerous Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), in an effort to amend the U.S. Constitution to say: “Equality of rights under law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State on account of sex.”

This legislation is now in the Illinois House for consideration and debate.  State Representative Lou Lang (D-Skokie) is the chief sponsor.  Although the session has adjourned, SJRCA 75 could move in the November veto session, after the November election. It’s critical that while state reps are home during the summer months,  you let them know what you think of this push to resurrect this radical leftist legislation from the 1970’s.

We’ve listed nine reasons to reject the Equal Right Amendment, but there are many more. In fact, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, is her report titled Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, claims the ERA will affect at least 800 federal laws.  

  1. Misleads publicized purpose – The ERA is not about equal rights for women. If it were, it would duplicate the 14th Amendment. 

  2. Contradicts Years of Social Science — Men and women are different.  ERA would remove all legal distinctions between sexes. ERA does not mention “women.” 

  3. Rejected time and time again — Previous Illinois lawmakers understood the true intention of the ERA and voted it down 13 times from 1972 to 1982. Every time it has been presented in Illinois General Assembly committees since 1982, it was stopped. Five states rescinded their passage of ERA: Nebraska – 1973, Tennessee – 1974, Idaho – 1977, Kentucky – 1978, South Dakota – 1979. 

  4. Ignores 1979 ratification deadline  — Congress granted an extension to 1982 which was ruled unconstitutional by a U.S. District Court in 1981 and the case went to the U.S. Supreme Court. On October 4, 1982, the Court dismissed it as moot, stating, “The amendment has failed of adoption no matter what the resolution of the legal issues presented here.” Additionally, no states passed ERA during the time extension.

  5. Ends Social Security Benefits for Spouses – According to Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, a book written by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the ERA will change 800 federal laws including the elimination of social security benefits for wives and widows. (pages 206, 211-212).

  6. Forces Women into Combat –  “Not only would women, including mothers be subject to the draft, but the military would be compelled to place them in combat units alongside of men and in some cases… (U.S. House Judiciary Committee Report (No. 92-359, July 14, 1971). “Equality of rights under law shall not be denied…on account of sex.”

  7. Eliminates Child Support  – “ …[I]t could relieve the fathers of the primary responsibility for the support of even infant children, as well as the support of the mothers of such children…” (U.S. House Judiciary Committee Report (No. 92-359, July 14, 1971). “Equality of rights under law shall not be denied…on account of sex.”

  8. Invalidates legal privacy protections – The ERA would be used to invalidate any laws or policies that prohibit men and women suffering from Gender Identity Disorder (GID) from using restrooms, locker rooms, and dressing rooms designated for the opposite sex.“Equality of rights under law shall not be denied…on account of sex.”

  9. Gives even more power to Federal Government — Section II of the ERA states that “The Congress shall have the power to enforce by appropriate legislation the provisions of this article.” This would give enormous new powers to the Federal Government that now belong to the states in areas of law which include traditional differences of treatment “on account of sex”: marriage, property laws, divorce and alimony, child custody, adoptions, abortion, sex crimes, private and public schools, prison regulations, and insurance. 

There is virtually no limit to the number and kind of lawsuits that ERA will spawn. This legislation will be used to eliminate the innate differences between males and females.  This is as absurd as using the law to eliminate the rising and setting of the sun.  It is impossible.

For the benefit of Illinois families, the Illinois Family Institute strongly urges a vote NO on SJRCA 75.

Take ACTION: Please CLICK HERE to contact your state representative to ask him/her to vote AGAINST the Equal Rights Amendment, SJRCA 75. The ERA will not help women. Instead, it will harm women, their families, and our society.

You can also call your state representative and ask him/her to vote NO to SJRCA 75 by calling the Capitol switchboard number at: (217) 782-2000.


 Stand with Illinois Family Institute!

 Make a Donation

Kathy Valente
Kathy joined the IFI team as our Director of Operations in 2008. Previously, Kathy was the state director for Concerned Women for America for 4 years. But even before that,...
Related Articles
Democrats Are Trying To Sneak A Feminist Amendment Into The Constitution, 36 Years Later
Democrats Are Trying To Sneak A Feminist Amendment Into The Constitution, 36 Years Later
Illinois House Ratifies the ERA
Illinois House Ratifies the ERA

US DEATH TOLL 2020

COVID-19: 128,740
ABORTION:  
IFI Featured Video
The U.S. judiciary isn’t quite so bad as it seems
Get Our New App!