Though I am not a firefighter, I know that sometimes that they have to use destructive methods to save structures and lives. Sometimes in fighting wildfires, it is necessary to burn portions of land to create a buffer and keep a fire from spreading.

Imagine if these protective measures were twisted to suggest that firefighters support arson and destruction of property.

I use this analogy to demonstrate how much the mainstream media introduces confusion in the way they support abortion. LiveAction recently reported this very thing in an article entitled, “New AP/NORC poll muddies waters on abortion… and reveals American confusion.”

In their efforts to justify the killing of the unborn, this poll brought together abortion and medical care for a miscarriage. They are two very different things, as different as arson and firefighting, but those conducting the poll wanted to blur the difference.

Abortion is not a standard treatment in pregnancy emergencies as Live Action news has succinctly stated.

Induced abortion is not the standard of care or “appropriate medical care” for any medical emergency during pregnancy, and the procedures and treatments that are standard of care are not prohibited by pro-life laws. Abortion is not the standard of care for the preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), preeclampsia, placenta accreta, placenta percreta, placenta increta, placenta previa, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, cervical insufficiency, or infection. While some of these conditions may require an early delivery of the baby, or a procedure to remove a deceased baby, these are not the same as intentionally killing the preborn child.

I have written before that far too many Americans have no problem with abortion.

The Democrat Party is all-in on abortion. And sadly, the Republican party is trying to play it neutral as much as possible. We are not to focus on the issue of abortion but only to concern ourselves with securing the border and getting inflation under control.

I reject this mentality, but I also believe that there is much confusion that is intentionally introduced to support the unjustified taking of life.

This is wicked and must be exposed.

There are several things to consider in response.

First, we must seek to be better acquainted with some of the medical issues, so we are not confused by false arguments.

Second, we must remain unapologetic in seeking the abolition of abortion. How we get to this point may vary. There are different strategies, but this must be our goal.

We don’t want to regulate murder; we want to end murder.

Third, while political involvement is crucial, it’s becoming painfully clear that in many places, forces opposed to life and goodness hold sway. This alarming trend demands immediate action, rather than passive waiting for political change. Must we not earnestly pray and actively work to share the truth with those about to make a horrific choice?

If you live in the Chicagoland area, please consider the great ministry of LoveLife. Join them at the busiest killing center in all of Illinois.

Do something to stand for life.