There has been an intentional effort underway for several decades to bring down the West. The effort is not an open, direct attack. Rather, it involves eroding the foundations of our culture, eating away at the supports, and corroding the superstructure.

The attack is indirect.

Right now, in all of Europe and North and South America, we are living out Hans Christian Andersen’s tale, “The Emperor Has No Clothes.” Does anyone know that story anymore? What links that story to what is happening now is the common thread of elites believing an absurdity, while the majority of non-elites see the truth.

The Emperor had been duped, by an appeal to his vanity, into believing that the fine clothes tailored by two conmen were so magnificent they could only be seen by smart people. They would be invisible to the incompetent or stupid. This is exactly what leftist elite conmen have been pushing in the last two decades regarding human sexuality.

It has gotten so bad that we have elevated a woman to the U.S. Supreme Court who cannot explain what a woman is.

All the Democrat Senators voted to confirm her, despite her confusion over a fundamental building block of creation. Three Republicans joined them— Susan Collins, Mitt Romney, and Lisa Murkowski.

Unbelievable.

None of these people who supported her confirmation should ever be elected to public office again or be allowed to serve in any leadership capacity.

Their support, alone, disqualifies them.

What makes a woman is not a matter of opinion. It is biology, easily grasped by any person since the beginning of time. You don’t need to be a biologist. You don’t need to be a scientist. You don’t even need a high school diploma or a grade school education.

What you need is a basic awareness of reality and an interest in the truth.

Consider this: if male and female are variable, rather than fixed, there is no certainty in any part of society. Everything becomes variable. The family is variable.

The church becomes fluid since all religions separate people—even religions with pagan gods—into male and female. The state is stripped of any sexual differentiation. These are extinction-level cataclysmic changes for society.

These conmen are even trying to convince us that you are transphobic if you refuse to accept a biological male as the female he claims to be. If you are a heterosexual male and you refuse to date a transgender woman (a biological male), you are transphobic.

Really? Is there a heterosexual male who would?

Here in Illinois, Representative Kelly Cassidy recently attacked Republicans who defended the right of girls to participate in sporting events without having boys posing as girls on the team. She directly accused the Republicans of being perversely obsessed with “the genitalia of children.”

Cassidy, a pure ideologue who is sold out to the ridiculous idea that a biological boy can be a girl, implied that anyone concerned with who is allowed in girls’ locker rooms and girls’ sports teams is a sexual deviant.

That’s 80% of us.

There is no point in trying to reason with people who are so foolish. Their positions have not been developed based on logic; there is no rational basis underlying their stance. The position is grounded solely on ideology.

Whether they realize it or not, they are simply mimicking the strategy employed by Mao Zedong during his takeover of China and subsequent consolidation of power during the Cultural Revolution.

Cassidy is only one of thousands of these leftists who are trying to tear down and restructure our entire culture, mainly by promoting their sexual agenda. The strategy involves staking out a position on an issue and demonizing the opposition.

James Lindsay, a mathematician, speaker, and author of six books on topics such as the philosophy of science, religion, Critical Race Theory (CRT) (he is a leading expert on CRT) explains the strategy as follows:

“Mao Zedong took over China with a strategy that will sadly feel unsettlingly familiar to us. Because he was able to mobilize hundreds of millions of people to comply, often enthusiastically, with his catastrophic programs, an adequate name for that strategy would be the politics of compliance . . .

“The goals of the politics of compliance are simple: to get as many people to comply as possible and to justify the dehumanization and demonization of anyone who refuses to comply.

“Mao’s politics of compliance begins by dividing the population not into three but into two. Those who comply are “the people.” Those who resist are “the enemies of the people.” Those in between are treated as representatives of both depending on the circumstances. Everything is done in the name of “the people,” and everything that isn’t working is blamed on “the enemies of the people.” . . .

“Those who comply have the psychology of their compliance weaponized into hatred for those who refuse to comply and even for those who merely drag their feet. They become the most savage weapon in the hands of the tyrants. The mechanism is essentially hatecraft. They have complied. They have done things they wouldn’t otherwise have done. They have willingly sacrificed their liberties for a cause or a “greater good” defined on the terms of the Regime. . . The problem is those who won’t comply, especially those who refuse to comply. They are led through these half-bogus promises and the psychology of their own compliance to hate the people who are keeping the promises from being fulfilled.”

Hatecraft is the right word.

We have seen it play out for years. Many so-called leaders have consistently tried to pit us against each other for the explicit purpose of fostering disunity. Some of the race hustlers have done this to enrich themselves and their organizations, others have done so to increase their personal power, but the goal of many of these purveyors of hatecraft has been to undermine the very foundational principles of our nation.

Don’t let them succeed.

Mao’s Cultural Revolution largely targeted the “four olds,” old customs, old culture, old habits, and old ideas. Get rid of the old and bring in the new. Who could oppose the new? The real focus was to finish tearing down everything left of Chinese traditions and replace them with Maoist ideology, in other words, Mao’s version of Marxism.

There is a reason the left in the US chose to focus their hatecraft on sexuality. Ever since the 50s, Kinsey’s fraudulent science has set the stage for accepting homosexuality as normal, natural. Since 1989, when Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen published their propaganda plan in After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s, a majority of the country has come to believe that falsehood.

Today, being affirming of the homosexual community, now known as the LGBTQ+ community, is considered a sign of tolerance, of caring, of loving. It’s all great. What the left has done is conflate the “T,” transgender, sexual fluidity, gender identity, with homosexuality.

But there is a huge difference between a person who is same sex attracted and a person who believes he’s been born in the wrong body, or the person who believes he can be a man today and a woman tomorrow and non-binary during a full moon.

The left has guilt-tripped their own into believing that if you accept same sex attraction, you must accept gender fluidity. If the left succeeds in convincing a majority of people—the rest of us—that a man can be a woman and a woman can be a man, they can redefine everything, which is exactly what they want to do. They want to start from scratch, beginning with a brand-new Constitution.

They are using hatecraft to force people to accept their view.

Fortunately, it is not working. Eighty percent of us are not falling for it. At least for now. Learn to recognize the strategy and counter it not with reason, but by exposing the absurdity of the assertions.

So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them: male and female he created them.  – Genesis 1:27