Tag Archives: Baronelle Stutzman
Compelled Speech? The 303 Creative SCOTUS Case
Not much time has passed since Christian baker Jack Phillips fought to defend his choice not to make cakes celebrating homosexual unions (2018), and Christian florist Baronelle Stutzman dealt with multiple lawsuits regarding her choice not to arrange flowers for similar functions (2021). Yet, earlier this December, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for 303 Creative v. Elenis, a case which is shaping up to be the next high-profile skirmish between the homosexual movement and Christian providers of wedding services. The civil rights snipers are at the same old game again—this time zeroing in on Christian wedding website …
Posted in Religious Liberty
|
Tagged 303 Creative v. Elenis, Baronelle Stutzman, blasphemy, Burstyn v. Wilson, Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, Cohen v. California, Commonwealth v. Kneeland, compelled speech, Jack Phillips, James Kent, Laurie Higgins, Lorie Smith, Miller v. California, Oney v. Oklahoma City, People v. Ruggles, State v. Chandler, State v. Mockus, U.S. Supreme Court, Updegraph v. Commonwealth
|
Comments Off on Compelled Speech? The 303 Creative SCOTUS Case
