Sex Ed Standards Ignore Optimal Health Protocols for School Children, K-12
 
Sex Ed Standards Ignore Optimal Health Protocols for School Children, K-12
01.12.12

Using the presumptuous title “National Sexuality Education Standards,” a group of anti-abstinence “experts” have offered a questionable version of what, when, and how, topics regarding sexuality should be taught in American schools. The National Abstinence Education Association (NAEA) challenges these so-called “standards” that ignore the optimal health message for students, and instead place a priority on a simple risk reduction message. “When we set standards, we should communicate the ideal, the best message to achieve optimal health,” stated Valerie Huber, Executive Director of NAEA. “When a set of guidelines fails to provide any meaningful emphasis on optimal health but instead gives priority to ‘condom negotiation’ skills, we have not set standards; we have lowered them and put our children at increased risk” added Huber.

In addition, NAEA disputes the appropriateness of introducing sensitive and often controversial topics into the K-12 classroom, essentially using sex education guidelines as a vehicle for promoting ideological agendas rather than health and well-being. “Standards claiming national influence should maintain an objectivity that is devoid of special-interest agendas,” added Huber.

NAEA advocates for strong, clear Sexual Risk Avoidance programs as the best standard for educating youth regarding sexuality.

Related Articles
Opinion: Bristol Palin is Neither a Hypocrite Nor a Liar
Opinion: Bristol Palin is Neither a Hypocrite Nor a Liar
Liberal Lawmaker Scrambles to Find Evidence for Comprehensive Sex Ed Bill But Fails
Liberal Lawmaker Scrambles to Find Evidence for Comprehensive Sex Ed Bill But Fails

US DEATH TOLL 2020

COVID-19: 105,165
ABORTION:  
IFI Featured Video
Governor Pritzker is Not Looking at Church Reopening from A Spiritual Perspective
Get Our New App!